

Ed Sheeran Wants To Set Up Taylor Swift, But We’re Not So Sure About His Matchmaking Skills
The Debrief: Ed put the cupid bow and arrow down, and stick to playing the guitar
So in our eyes Ed Sheeran can do no wrong. He’s the most loveable, adorkable (that’s adorable crossed with dorky FYI) pop star EVER. And we love him, we really do. However when it comes to his matchmaking skills for our fave gal, and his BFF, Taylor Swift – well we think he’s a little bit off.
This week Ed told Now magazine that he hoped he could set up Taylor with none other that Orlando Bloom. He said ‘He’s lovely, and they live in the same building. [I'm hoping that] the magic might present itself eventually.’
Er, we’re not so sure.
Now don’t get us wrong we’ve had a soft spot for floppy haired Mr Bloom since his Pirate days, and when he took a swing at Bieber earlier this year well we know which side of the ring we were on.
But is he worthy of all that is T-Swift? The jury is out. And let’s not forget Bloom's also already dated Taylor’s BFF Selena, we predict that might make this matchmake very unlikely as Taylor is 100% 'Sisters Before Misters'.
Ultimately we think Tay can do better, but then we're not sure there is any man who is worthy!
Like this? You might also be interested in:
South Park Does A Lorde Skit. But Who’s It Taking The Piss Out Of?
Lorde Gave Taylor Swift The First Listen To Her New Song
Follow Lena on Twitter: @Lenadecasparis
Pictures: Getty

At work? With your gran?
You might want to think about the fact you're about to read something that wouldn't exactly get a PG rating
Comments
The Debrief chat powered by DISQUS Read more
Disqus
Disqus allows you to post comments on our site. You can only post comments if you register with Disqus and your registration data will be handled in accordance with their privacy policy.
Disqus will use your registration data (email) to send you additional information. Details of how you can opt out are contained in the verification email which you will be sent after you sign up
Please read the Disqus terms of service
Loading...
comments powered by Disqus