Tourneys management¶
The tourney is clearly the primary element of the whole system, everything has been designed to allow an easy and fast management of these events.
The tourneys window by default does not show future tournaments: to see them, reset the filter applied to the date field.
Contents
Insert and edit¶
Date and description¶
Each tourney has a date and a description of the event and there cannot be two dictinct tourneys in the same date associated to a single championship.
Championship¶
A tournament belongs to a particular championship.
Duration and prealarm¶
The duration and prealarm refer to the length of a single round, and are expressed in minutes. They will be used by the countdown window.
Rating¶
A tourney may use a particular rating: in such a case, the first round is generated accordingly with the rate of each player instead of using a random order.
Pairings¶
The pairing method determines how the pairing are done at each new round:
All possible matches
- the
all
algorithm generates all possible combinations, without a particular ordering; Ranking order
- the
serial
algorithm will try to pair a competitor with one of the competitors that follow him in the current ranking order, for example the first with the second, the third with the fourth, and so on; Cross ranking order
- to delay as much as possible most exciting matches, the
dazed
method is more elaborated: it takes the competitors with same points as the pivot, and tries to pair the first with the one in the middle of that series, the second with the middle+1 one, and so on.
Attention
With less than eight competitors the serial
and dazed
algorithms cannot
guarantee the generation of all possible matches. Should this happen, SoL will
suggests to switch to the all
method to generate remaining matches.
In general, with such a low number of competitors, I recommend using the all
method from the beginning.
Delay top players pairing¶
The delay top players pairing, meaningful only when the tourney is associated with a rating, determines how many rounds will use an higher priority for the Glicko rate of each competitor over the net score in the ordering used by the pairing method.
Note
SoL uses five parameters to rank the competitors:
- points
- bucholz
- net score
- total score
- Glicko rate
Before playing the first round the first 4 values are all zero, so only the fifth is crucial. At the beginning of the second round, all winners have the same score and the same bucholz, thus the net score become decisive.
From the point of view of rounds generation, for the beauty of the game it is generally desirable to delay as much as possible the matches between top players: to this end it is sufficient to give an higher priority to the Glicko rate, moving it to the third place, after the bucholz and before the net score.
The value assigned to this field controls how many turns shall be generated using this
different sorting criteria: the default value of 1
means that it will be used at
the end of the first round to generate the second one; a value of 0
instead
inhibits this delay and therefore only the first round is determined by the Glicko
rate, from the second onward it becomes irrelevant. Values higher than 1
have an
impact less and less significant, because from the third round on the points and the
bucholz become more and more predominant.
Phantom score¶
The phantom score is the score assigned to a player in the matches against the phantom player, when there are an odd number of competitors. By convention these matches assign a score of 25 to the player but there may be cases where a different score is more appropriate, for example when the number of competitors is very low and winning 25—0 would be an unfair advantage.
Responsible¶
The responsible is usually the user that inserted that particular tournament: the information related to the tournament are changeable only by him (and also by the administrator of the system).
Finals¶
The finals is the number of finals that will be played. It can be either left blank
or it must be a number between 0
and 2
inclusive: in the former case, finals will be
handled manually, that is SoL won’t generate final matches but the results shall be reflected
by adjusting the bounties. A value of 0
means that there won’t be any final, 1
means
that SoL will generate one single final match for the first and the second place, with 2
SoL will generate two final matches, one for the first and second place and another for the
third and fourth place.
Final kind¶
The final kind determines the kind of finals that will be played:
Single match
- the
single
kind will create one single round, with a match between the first and the second ranked competitors and, if finals is set to2
, another one pairing the third and the fourth ranked competitors Best of three matches
- the
bestof3
method will create at most three rounds, the final is won by the competitor that wins at least two of them.
As soon as the final scores of all these rounds are entered the bounty giving operation to assign final bounties is performed automatically.
Retirements¶
The retirements allows you to choose a different mechanism to compute the
bucholz
value when there are retired competitors. Normally that value is computed summing
up the points
of the opponents a given contender met, so that it’s basically a measure of
their strength. When one (or more) of these opponents stop playing, their points value remains
constant and thus it does not contribute to the rank of the competitors he played against. In
highly competitive tournaments this may be seen as a penalty, so we tried to come up with a
mechanism to mitigate the effect. The options are:
none
- the classic behavior, no adjustment at all: the
bucholz
value is just the sum of thepoints
of the opponents trend
- computes the average points (excluding matches against the phantom) of the retired player
and assigns an extra bonus to his opponents, so that their
bucholz
value is artificially augmented by an amount equals to that average multiplied by the number of turns; in other words, it would appear as if the retired player kept going on at the same pace trend70
- similar to the above, but it considers the 70% of the average points
Warning
This is an experimental approach, be sure to understand the implications before using it!